Which idiots wrote that? And what standing does this "Neighbourhood Plan" actually have. It mentions that any development that removes the existing pool will be refused, but what authority do the authors have for that claim, ie, is this "Plan" actually legally binding, or is it a NIMBY busybodies charter like the Civic society is?
For all your information on the Marple Neighbourhood Plan needs:
http://ourmarpleplan.co.uk/You can have your say on the plan. It needs 50% of people to vote in favour of it in order for Stockport Council to adopt it.
Given that the site is up for sale, this is actually the best currently available site for rebuilding the pool. My preference would be for having it on the Rec, but that'll almost certainly never happen, so this is the next best option.
Actually it's a terrible option.
It's far from the town centre.
It's far away from most of Marple's population (although the people of Offerton would benefit)
It's £7m for the land alone.
It's not easy to get to by bus.
It's on a road that's already pretty congested, especially at peak hours.
It's virtually next door (well 1 mile away) from Romiley pool.
Even if you could solve the other factors, there's no point in the council having two leisure facilities so close to each other. It might make sense if you closed both Romiley and Marple and merged them on a single, bigger site. But I think we can all agree that that would go down like a lead balloon.