The points Dusty makes, and she admits this, are prompted by a perceived threat to her business, self-serving but understandable. The points about MIA are just sniping, in my humble opinion, and are only of any interest because they are from the partner of an elected member representing Marple. Dusty is of course free to air her opinions but what I do find troubling is the purposeful way she has sought to publicise these views. Whether you agree with the aims if MIA or not, is it helpful, or proper, for the partner of an elected member to make such negative remarks about the community?
As said, Dusty purposefully publicised her letter so I would suggest she, and anyone else who chooses to post on a public forum, should be prepared to have their points countered and challenged.